|
Exhibit-4
DAS ANALYSIS SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. OBTAINED GCA AND COMPOSITE DESCRIPTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Score |
|
.95 confidence |
|
Classifications |
|
PR |
|
GCA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VERBAL (V): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONVERBAL REASONING (NvR): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPATIAL (SP): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. CONSIDERATIONS OF GCA vs. CLUSTER DIFFERENCES (9
points for significance) |
|
If any comparison is found to be significant and abnormal (10%
or less) consider the GCA an inadequate summary of abilities. |
|
GCA vs |
DIFF. |
|
STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT |
|
ABNORMAL |
|
FREQUENCY (Table B.3. p. 291) |
|
VERBAL: |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ____ % of the population. |
|
NONVERBAL REASONING: |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ___ % of the population. |
|
SPATIAL: |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ___ % of the population. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. DETERMINING BETWEEN-CLUSTER DIFFERENCES (16
points for significance) |
|
If any Cluster comparison is found to be significant and
abnormal (10% or less) consider the GCA an inadequate summary of
abilities. |
|
Cluster vs. Cluster |
DIFF. |
|
STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT |
|
ABNORMAL |
|
FREQUENCY (Table B.3. p. 291) |
|
V vs. NvR : |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ____ % of the population. |
|
V vs. SP: |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ____ % of the population. |
|
NvR vs. SP: |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ____ % of the population. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. DETERMINING WITHIN-CLUSTER DIFFERENCES (varying
point for significance) |
|
If any comparison is found to be significant and abnormal (10%
or less) consider the Cluster an inadequate summary of abilities. |
|
|
DIFF. |
|
STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT |
|
ABNORMAL |
|
FREQUENCY (Table B.3. p. 291) |
|
WDef vs. Sim (12 pts) : |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ____ % of the population. |
|
Mat vs. SQR (11 pts) : |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ___ % of the population. |
|
RDes vs. PCon (10 pts) : |
|
|
Y / N |
|
Y / N |
|
in ____ % of the population. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. SUBTEST ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEAN CORE T SCORE: |
|
|
|
|
Difference from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Score |
|
Value |
|
Mean Core T |
|
High/ Low (H / L) |
|
|
|
Word Definitions (WDef) : |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarities (Sim) : |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matrices (Mat) : |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seq. & Quant. Reasoning (SQR) : |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recall of Designs (RDes) : |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pattern Construction (PCon) : |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recall of Digits (RDig) : |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recall of Objects - Immed. (RObj-I) : |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speed of Infor. Process. (SIP) : |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recall of Objects - Delay (RObj-D) : |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(RObj-I) vs (RObj-D) : |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
No Significant difference |
|
Recall of Digits vs. Objects: |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
Digits / Objects Higher |