Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1996) Oral and Written Language Scales Circle Pines MN: American Guidance Service

Dumont, R. Cruse, C., Price, L. & Whelley, P. (1996) The relationship between the Differential Ability Scales and the WISC-III for students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools. 33.3, 203-209

Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Farr, L. P., McCarthy, T., & Price, L. (2000). The relationship between the Differential Ability Scales (DAS) and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability-Revised (WJ-R COG) for students referred for special education evaluations. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 27-38.

Elliott, C. D. (1990a) DAS Administration and Scoring Manual San Antonio TX: The Psychological Corporation

Elliott, C. D. (1990b) DAS Introductory and Technical Handbook San Antonio TX: The Psychological Corporation

Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S. & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc Theory: A Contemporary Approach to Interpretation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Flanagan, D. P., & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). Essentials of Cross-Battery Assessment. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Flynn, J. R. (1998). IQ gains over time: Toward finding the causes. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Kaplan, E. (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll & B. K. Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Ortiz, S. O. & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). Gf-Gc cross-battery interpretation and selective cross-battery assessment: Referral concerns and the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse populations. In K. S. McGrew & D. P. Flanagan, The Intelligence Test Desk Reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc Cross-Battery Assessment (pp. 401-444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Youngstrom, E. A., Kogos, J. L., & Glutting, J. J. (1999) Incremental efficacy of the Differential Ability Scales factor scores in predicting individual achievement criteria. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 26-39.